612-877-5000 | Contact us

Extranet Login

WEALTH PRESERVATION AND ESTATE PLANNING

 

Wealth PreservationExpertise combined with patience, a listening ear and a touch of diplomacy are the qualities that highlight our Wealth Preservation and Estate Planning group. Since 1896, Moss & Barnett attorneys have helped clients plan for the preservation, conservation and management of their assets and businesses.

Our attorneys have worked with:

  • Parents concerned about providing for their children
  • Individuals looking for ways to pass on their assets while minimizing taxes
  • Business owners seeking to gradually relinquish control to a new generation
  • Clients who want to benefit their families or community
  • Employees who are contemplating business ownership

Inevitably, situations like these present challenging legal, financial and emotional issues.

Moss & Barnett's wealth preservation attorneys enable clients to achieve their financial and personal objectives and customize estate plans while minimizing tax burdens, in an atmosphere of empathy and understanding.

Our services include:

  • The preparation of wills, trusts, powers of attorneys, living wills and related documents
  • Tax reduction strategies
  • Estate and trust administration
  • Private foundations
  • Charitable trusts
  • Trustee selection
  • Guardianships and conservatorships
  • Resolution of family and business differences
  • Succession planning for family-owned businesses
  • Life insurance trusts and related planning
  • Assistance in IRS tax audits
  • Prenuptial agreements
  • Retirement planning

Related

News Headlines


Case Summaries

Elder Law

[05/13] Cao v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
In an action wherein plaintiff sought recovery under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 for alleged constitutional violations along with several state law causes of action after she was removed from her home, made to undergo a psychological evaluation, and placed in a state institution for the elderly, dismissal of plaintiff's complaint is affirmed where: 1) the district court properly dismissed plaintiff's section 1983 claim as untimely; and 2) with no federal cause of action remaining, the district court acted within its discretion in declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over remaining state law claims.

[05/05] Miller v. Am. Airlines, Inc.
In a suit against American Airlines under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where: 1) a collective bargaining agreement did not require that plaintiffs be offered positions of comparable pay past the retirement age; 2) a claim, that a supplement to the collective bargaining agreement governing the retirement of flight engineers was facially discriminatory, was not properly raised before the EEOC.

More...

Probate Trusts

[09/04] Masry v. Masry
In a probate matter, judgment finding that husband's revocation from joint trust was valid is affirmed where: 1) the revocation provision in the trust was not explicitly exclusive; and 2) husband's method of revocation complied with Probate Code section 15401, subdivision (a)(2).

[08/27] Estate of Clementi
Denial of petition to revoke probate is affirmed where: 1) the deceased manifested a sufficient intent to create a charitable trust through his will, although his will does not identify a specific charity; and 2) the deceased's stated intent to "give the balance of my assets to a charitable foundation or trust" is sufficient to create the trust.

More...


4800 WELLS FARGO CENTER | 90 South Seventh Street | Minneapolis, MN 55402-4129
P: 612-877-5000 F: 612-877-5999 Contact us