612-877-5000 | Contact us

Extranet Login

ENERGY REGULATION

Moss & Barnett’s Energy Regulation group consists of four attorneys and one paralegal. Members of Moss & Barnett’s Energy Regulation Group have the following relevant experience:

Mike Bradley – selected by Best Lawyers as one of the top lawyers in Energy/Public Utility Law, has worked full-time in utility and telephone regulation since 1983. Mike was the Manager of the Minnesota Office of Attorney General – Residential Utilities Division ("OAG") for nearly six years. During that period, he individually or jointly represented the OAG in a wide variety of matters, including fourteen rate cases (four electric, five natural gas and five telephone). Subsequent to joining Moss & Barnett, Mike has participated in a number of major regulatory proceedings, including:

  • Eleven rate cases (seven natural gas, three electric and one telephone)
  • Representation of the natural gas industry in a Minnesota right-of-way rulemaking
  • A proceeding to monetize externalities
  • A Kansas ad valorem tax refund proceeding
  • The proceeding that developed the Minnesota conservation improvement plan financial incentives

Other major regulatory proceedings have included:

  • Northern States Power’s successful request for a Certificate of Need for Prairie Island dry cask storage (which involved approximately five weeks of hearings)
  • Certificate of Need proceedings for three peaking plants and several transmission route permit proceedings
  • Several major telecommunications proceedings related to access charges

Mike has also successfully represented utility clients in at least nine appellate court proceedings (e.g., Minnegasco and Interstate Power and Light ) deciding, respectively, that goodwill belongs to the shareholders, and that manufactured gas plant remediation costs are recoverable utility expenses.

Rick Johnson – selected by Best Lawyers as one of the top lawyers in Energy/Public Utility Law, has concentrated on representing regulated entities regulation since 1976. Rick has individually or jointly represented private utility and telephone companies in seventeen rate cases (two electric, five gas and ten telephone). Rick has also been involved in a number of complex telephone hearings involving rate and cost determinations, each lasting from four to six weeks, as well as numerous transactions, including mergers, sales, acquisitions and joint ventures.

Dan Lipschultzone of only two Minnesota regulatory attorneys listed in Who’s Who Legal: The International Who’s Who of Business Lawyers, has worked full-time in utility and telecommunications regulation since 1990. Dan spent six years as an attorney for the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission and four years as an Assistant Attorney General with the Minnesota Attorney General’s Office. Dan subsequently served as Associate General Counsel with McLeodUSA for two years before joining Moss & Barnett in September 2002.

Some of the major energy matters Dan has worked on include:

  • Xcel Energy’s most recent electric rate case
  • The Xcel Energy merger proceeding
  • A recent appeal challenging an energy company’s permit from the Environmental Quality Board to construct a high voltage transmission line
  • A transmission line routing proceeding
  • Various other proceedings involving the monetization of environmental externalities
  • Resource planning, stray voltage and other matters

Cecilia Ray – has worked full-time on regulatory and business issues for Moss & Barnett’s regulatory clients since 1991. Cecilia has participated in several regulatory proceedings before the Minnesota Commission and provides additional capacity, should it be needed.

Jean Hunsinger – has worked as a paralegal and legal assistant in the regulatory area since 1991. Jean assists with research, marshalling of resources and facts, case management and supervising complex filings.


Related

News Headlines


News

Energy

[08/15] Growth in China car sales slows due to oil prices
[08/15] President: Indonesia to tackle power crisis

More...

Case Summaries

Public Utilities

[08/29] Util. Reform Network v. Pub. Util. Comm'n
Petition to review order by Public Utilities Commission awarding of only part of attorney fees sought is affirmed in part and reversed in part where: 1) PUC's decision bore reasonable relation to the purpose and language of the governing provisions of the Public Utilities Code; 2) PUC did not err in denying a multiplier; and 3) PUC erred in awarding plaintiff's outside counsel hourly rates of up to $470/hour instead of the $550/hour they asked for.

[08/29] City of Cloverdale v. Dept. of Transp.
In plaintiff-city's cross-complaint for indemnity, damages, and declaratory relief related to a lawsuit by nearby property owners for flooding caused by drainage channel constructed by the defendant Department of Transportation, judgment for defendant is reversed on the indemnity causes of action but is otherwise affirmed where plaintiff city failed to exhaust an administrative remedy by which the relinquishment could have been challenged.

More...


4800 WELLS FARGO CENTER | 90 South Seventh Street | Minneapolis, MN 55402-4129
P: 612-877-5000 F: 612-877-5999 Contact us